Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1069

reference
1001-tree-1
name
1069
tree-preservation-order

undefined

1001-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.024614 50.873909)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.024571 50.873904,-1.024573 50.873912,-1.024579 50.873920,-1.024589 50.873926,-1.024600 50.873930,-1.024613 50.873931,-1.024627 50.873930,-1.024639 50.873926,-1.024648 50.873920,-1.024654 50.873913,-1.024657 50.873905,-1.024655 50.873896,-1.024649 50.873889,-1.024640 50.873883,-1.024628 50.873879,-1.024615 50.873877,-1.024589 50.873882,-1.024580 50.873888,-1.024574 50.873896,-1.024571 50.873904)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL